seanius.net/ blog/ 2009/ 04/   a productive weekend for debian stuff

(note that i've just tried enabling the comments feature of ikiwiki, so feel free to use it :) )

(update: okay so i apparently failed to enable comments earlier... but it should be working now :) )

compiz(-fusion) 0.8.2 uploaded to unstable

for all you lovers of desktop bling, the latest stable release of compiz-fusion has been uploaded to unstable. new features of note:

new one-off script for building compiz packages

the biggest problem with trying to maintain compiz packages is that they're for some reason distributed as almost a dozen different source projects upstream, but extremely interdependant wrt their API. therefore updating the packages to a new upstream version is a Big Pain. i've numbed that pain a bit with a new helper script, which should amongst other things make it easier to manage backports to lenny, which i've already seen people requesting.

compiz 0.8.2 lenny packages available for testing

..which brings us to our next topic. before i upload them to somewhere a little more official, i figure i could put a call out to teh lazywebs to do some QA work and make sure that it doesn't totally explode on your system (unless you're using the explode animation plugin, in which case it's functioning properly)

sources.list entry to try it out on an amd64 lenny system:

deb http://people.debian.org/~seanius/compiz/lenny-backports/amd64 ./

sources.list entry to try it out on an i386 lenny system:

deb http://people.debian.org/~seanius/compiz/lenny-backports/i386 ./

and then apt-get install compiz compiz-fusion-plugins-main (etc)

so give it a try and let me know how it goes!

pkg-php moving to git

with some initial legwork from Mark Hershberger we've migrated to a git repository for the php packaging vcs. due to the long and convoluted history of our svn repository, we decided it wasn't worth the effort of trying to get every single svn commit mapped into the new repo. as a compromise to having to start from scratch, we used the existing branches/tags on top of a series of upstream tarball imports to get an accurate representation of the release history.

new git<->bts integration hook for debian packaging

i've been dabbling with a new hook to make for more useful integration from a git-buildpackage oriented workflow. in this workflow the changelog is often the last thing prepared, possibly days or even weeks after a fix has been committed for a bug. therefore the standard tagpending and typical changelog-scanning hooks aren't incredibly useful.

instead, this hook scans for "Closes:" meta-info in the commits, similar to how "git dch" does, and then sends a notification and/or control commands to the bts. here's an example. note that it also mentions the branch that recieved the fix in the notification, so it's easier to see which branches have a fix at a quick glance.

how to use this for your own git repo:

REPO_PATH=/path/to/your/repo.git
HOOK_REPO_PATH=/somewhere/you/want/to/put/it
git clone git://git.debian.org/users/seanius/vcs-hooks/git-hooks.git $HOOK_REPO_PATH
ln -sf $HOOK_REPO_PATH/git-post-receive-url-notifications.py $REPO_PATH/hooks/post-receive

there's a number of configurable options (take a look at the top of the file for some fairly verbose comments), but it should work with some fairly reasonable defaults out of the box.

it can also be configured to do the more traditional changelog-scanning, but i'm finding it to be a better workflow to avoid combining changelog entries with the actual fixes (makes them harder to cherry-pick later), and a notification with a link to the changelog entry really isn't that useful beyond what "bts tag nnn pending" can already do. plus i don't like the typical duplication involved in manually managing the changelog. i find it better to generate the changelog via git-dch and automatically get all the "closes:" tags, and then just do a bit of editorial touchups before preparing/releasing the upload.

so give it a try if you like, feel free to send feedback/fixes/etc. for example i think the utf-8 support might still be a bit dodgy, as well as possibly the automatic gitweb url detection and changelog scanning.